<br />
<b>Warning</b>:  Declaration of Jetpack_IXR_Client::query() should be compatible with IXR_Client::query(...$args) in <b>/data/0/0/003ce5a9-f634-46c5-b150-c305387a3b75/mylion.sk/web/wp-content/plugins/jetpack/vendor/automattic/jetpack-connection/legacy/class-jetpack-ixr-client.php</b> on line <b>0</b><br />
{"id":234,"date":"2019-11-25T06:31:11","date_gmt":"2019-11-25T05:31:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/?p=234"},"modified":"2023-07-03T19:58:08","modified_gmt":"2023-07-03T17:58:08","slug":"hranice-poznania-a-pomenovania","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/?p=234","title":{"rendered":"Hranice poznania a pomenovania"},"content":{"rendered":"\n<p>Za&#269;ni TU &ndash; <a href=\"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/wp-admin\/post.php?post=911&amp;action=edit\" target=\"_blank\" rel=\"noreferrer noopener\">https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/wp-admin\/post.php?post=911&amp;action=edit<\/a><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>To &#269;o &bdquo;NIE-existuje&ldquo; si nevieme predstavi&#357; ani pomenova&#357;. U&#382; slovo &bdquo;neexistencia&ldquo; a ich pou&#382;&iacute;vanie v absol&uacute;tnom zmysle ako NIE-existencia s&uacute; chybn&eacute; (m&ocirc;&#382;e&scaron; poveda&#357; ni&#269; v tomto priestore alebo neexistuje d&ocirc;vod na nie&#269;o, ale nie absol&uacute;tnu &bdquo;NIE-existenciu&ldquo; . S&uacute; nevyhnutnou vedomou chybou v logickom myslen&iacute;, preto&#382;e &#269;o m&aacute; meno, existuje. &#268;o chce&scaron; uchopi&#357;, pou&#382;i&#357;, pochopi&#357; mus&iacute; existova&#357;. Je chybou, s ktorou mus&iacute;me &#382;i&#357;, a ktor&aacute; je nevyhnutn&aacute; pre na&scaron;u existenciu. Je to hranica, hr&aacute;dza, ktorou sa ukotvujeme v existencii pred &scaron;ialenstvom a chaosom, hororom a tot&aacute;lnym zni&#269;en&iacute;m, impl&oacute;ziou, &#269;o vyvol&aacute;va ak&yacute;ko&#318;vek pokus predstavi&#357; si &bdquo;NIE-existenciu&ldquo;. Je chybou, ktorou ukotvujeme Ja &ndash; &bdquo;Ja som&ldquo;. &bdquo;NIE-existencia&ldquo; nem&ocirc;&#382;e ma&#357; meno, nem&ocirc;&#382;e by&#357; ani definovan&aacute; nepriamo ako opak &bdquo;existencie&ldquo; alebo &bdquo;neskuto&#269;nos&#357;&ldquo;, preto&#382;e u&#382; vtedy by existovala, bola by nie&#269;&iacute;m. To &#269;o definujeme a &#269;o si predstavujeme ako &bdquo;NIE-existencia&ldquo; nie je v skuto&#269;nosti pr&aacute;zdnota. Pr&aacute;zdnota nie je &bdquo;NIE-existencia&ldquo;. Pr&aacute;zdnota je priestor, v ktorom sa ni&#269; nenach&aacute;dza, &#269;i u&#382; fyzicko &ndash; &#269;asov&yacute; priestor (ako hovor&iacute;me o obsahu, tak nie s&uacute; pr&iacute;tomn&eacute; &#382;iadne veci, ak hovor&iacute;me z poh&#318;adu (<a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/wp-admin\/post.php?post=3805&amp;action=edit\" target=\"_blank\">&#268;o je Poh&#318;ad<\/a>) dynamiky tak absol&uacute;tny pokoj alebo napr&iacute;klad &#382;iadna zmena &ndash; zr&yacute;chlenie \/ spomalenie &hellip;) alebo du&scaron;evn&yacute; (&#382;iadne pocity \/ &#382;iaden nepokoj \/ vyrovnanos&#357;) alebo duchovn&yacute; (&#382;iadne my&scaron;lienky). Podstatn&eacute; je, aby to bola vedom&aacute; chyba. Je zauj&iacute;mav&eacute;, &#382;e mo&#382;no m&ocirc;&#382;eme vyu&#382;i&#357; symbol &bdquo;0&ldquo; alebo &bdquo;000&ldquo;. Nie je to matematika, ale podobne, ako v matematike si nezn&aacute;mu premenn&uacute; si ozna&#269;&iacute;me nezn&aacute;mou &bdquo;x&ldquo;, nie&#269;&iacute;m &#269;o nepozn&aacute;me, a nemus&iacute;me o tom ni&#269; vedie&#357;. Rie&scaron;enie ani nemus&iacute; existova&#357; a teda ani &bdquo;x&ldquo;, nemus&iacute; existova&#357; a my dokonca vieme, &#382;e v tomto pr&iacute;pade &bdquo;x&ldquo; \/ &bdquo;0&ldquo; \/ &bdquo;000&ldquo; &bdquo;neexistuje&ldquo;. Samozrejme v tomto pr&iacute;pade sa nebude jedna&#357; o rovnicu \/ nerovnicu, pravdu \/ nepravdu (logika s&uacute; len niektor&eacute; uzavret&eacute; cykly &ndash; logick&yacute; s&uacute;&#269;et, logick&yacute; s&uacute;&#269;in, nektor&eacute; uzavret&eacute; cykly s&uacute; nelogick&eacute;). Ide o symbol. A &#269;o tak symbolick&eacute; v&yacute;po&#269;ty \/ symbolick&eacute; transform&aacute;cie (premeny)? A tak sa na prv&yacute; poh&#318;ad zd&aacute;, &#382;e sme n&aacute;&scaron; probl&eacute;m vyrie&scaron;ili. Ak je to naozaj tak, a skuto&#269;ne tak m&ocirc;&#382;eme urobi&#357;, tak mo&#382;no symbol je zatia&#318; jedinou (mo&#382;no s&uacute; viacer&eacute;) cestou ako rozumne uchopi&#357; nielen &bdquo;ni&#269; \/ neexistenciu&ldquo;, ale aj &#271;al&scaron;ie ot&aacute;zky napr&iacute;klad &#318;udsk&eacute;ho &#382;ivota. V&yacute;hodou v&yacute;po&#269;tov&eacute;ho \/ premenn&eacute;ho (transforma&#269;n&eacute;ho) zd&ocirc;vodnenia je to, &#382;e Ti sta&#269;&iacute; rozum, nepotrebuje&scaron; intu&iacute;ciu ani vieru, &#269;omu sa pri rie&scaron;en&iacute; &#357;a&#382;k&yacute;ch a v&scaron;eobecne nezodpovedan&yacute;ch ot&aacute;zok &#318;udsk&eacute;ho &#382;ivota nevyhne&scaron;. Je to lep&scaron;ie ako meno &bdquo;neexistencia&ldquo; alebo &bdquo;ni&#269;ota&ldquo;, ale pri d&ocirc;slednom zva&#382;ovan&iacute; v&scaron;ak aj tieto rie&scaron;enia s&uacute; nepravdiv&eacute;. Symbol m&ocirc;&#382;e symbolizova&#357; iba nie&#269;o &#269;o existuje a rovnica, ktor&aacute; nem&aacute; rie&scaron;enie, znamen&aacute;, &#382;e v&yacute;sledok na danom defini&#269;nom obore, je pr&aacute;zdna mno&#382;ina. Na prv&eacute; pomyslenie by to teoreticky mohla by&#357; hypotetick&aacute; rovnica s platn&yacute;m defini&#269;n&yacute;m oborom, ktorej obor hodn&ocirc;t &bdquo;neexistuje&ldquo; &ndash; ale &#269;o to znamen&aacute; \/ nie je to somarina? Treba to premyslie&#357; &hellip;<\/li><li>Preto nikdy netreba zab&uacute;da&#357; a by&#357; si vedom&yacute;, &#382;e pri pokusoch prekro&#269;i&#357; to, &#269;o existuje, v&#382;dy rob&iacute;me a budeme robi&#357; chybu, aj ke&#271; je to nevyhnutn&eacute;.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-cyan-bluish-gray-background-color has-background has-medium-font-size\"><strong>Nepodstatn&eacute; &uacute;vahy<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>DOPRACUJ! &ndash; &#269;o je pred, teda n&aacute;sledn&eacute; vzniklo z predo&scaron;l&eacute;ho (prejaven&eacute; napr. v scholastike realistami a nominalistami) (v tomto &bdquo;individu&aacute;lnom &#269;ase&ldquo;, v tejto postupnosti &ndash; &#269;lovek alebo &#269;love&#269;ina, kateg&oacute;ria alebo jednotlivos&#357;, idea alebo skuto&#269;n&yacute; prejav idei, &hellip; Cel&eacute; obdobia filozofie rie&scaron;ili t&uacute;to nepodstatn&uacute; ot&aacute;zku, ktor&aacute; je vyrie&scaron;en&aacute; oby&#269;ajn&yacute;m popisom skuto&#269;nosti (stvoren&eacute; vo variante na&scaron;ich volieb). &#268;o m&ocirc;&#382;e&scaron; dok&aacute;za&#357;, odvodi&#357;, &#269;o skuto&#269;ne napom&aacute;ha veci (ako sa zachova&#357; v zmysle &#269;o urobi&#357;, ako sa rozv&iacute;ja&#357;, ako pochopi&#357; lep&scaron;ie, ako uchopi&#357; skuto&#269;nos&#357; [okam&#382;ik stvoren&eacute;ho],  ako to urobi&#357; lep&scaron;ie, ako sa ma&#357; lep&scaron;ie, &hellip;). Na&#269;o to v&scaron;etko filozofovanie? Ale ak n&aacute;jdem jednu vec, ktorou to vyrie&scaron;im, tak sa v tomto odseku m&yacute;lim. Ale, skuto&#269;ne, na&#269;o s&uacute; tie &uacute;vahy dobr&eacute;? &#268;o hovoria? &#268;o rie&scaron;ia? &#268;o rie&scaron;i uva&#382;ovanie o t&yacute;chto veciach v zmysle &#269;o je prim&aacute;rne a &#269;o odvoden&eacute;? &#268;o je nadraden&eacute; a &#269;o z toho vypl&yacute;va \/ je podraden&eacute;? &#268;i to je len &#318;udsk&yacute; kon&scaron;trukt alebo &#268;o? &#268;o u&#382;ito&#269;n&eacute; m&ocirc;&#382;em toho odvodi&#357;? K &#269;omu ved&uacute;? V&scaron;etko existuje a v&scaron;etko sl&uacute;&#382;i svojmu &uacute;&#269;elu. Skuto&#269;n&eacute; veci funguj&uacute;. Preto&#382;e to funguje, budem to robi&#357;. Nepotrebujem to rie&scaron;i&#357;. Vid&iacute;m. Vid&iacute;m &#269;loveka, konkr&eacute;tneho &#269;loveka. Jednotlivos&#357;. Vid&iacute;m &#318;udskos&#357; \/ &#269;love&#269;inu. Vid&iacute;m &#318;udskos&#357; \/ &#269;love&#269;inu. Vid&iacute;m ju aj ke&#271; sa pozriem na toho konkr&eacute;tneho &#269;loveka a (vn&uacute;torn&yacute;m zrakom vid&iacute;m) viem &#269;o je homo sapiens sapiens a viem &#382;e existuje nie&#269;o ako &#318;udskos&#357; \/ &#269;love&#269;ina. Organizujem. &Scaron;truk&uacute;rujem. Je to proste &scaron;trukt&uacute;ra existencie, ktor&aacute; n&aacute;m pom&aacute;ha pochopi&#357;, robi&#357; veci, pracova&#357;, sledova&#357; svoje ciele, &hellip; Nik nem&ocirc;&#382;e poveda&#357;, &#382;e &#269;i u&#382; &bdquo;podstata&ldquo; \/ kateg&oacute;ria \/ druh alebo &bdquo;forma&ldquo; \/ jednotlivos&#357; neexistuje. Poobzerajte sa okolo seba. Oboje proste vid&iacute;m. A existuje, preto&#382;e funguje. Vo v&scaron;etk&yacute;ch smeroch. Je to proste oby&#269;ajn&aacute; ot&aacute;zka organiz&aacute;cie vedomost&iacute; a videnia, nie probl&eacute;m existencie? \/ bytia?, ktor&yacute; by bolo treba rie&scaron;i&#357;.  Nevid&iacute;m &uacute;&#382;itok \/ prospech \/ zmysel z toho, aby som to rie&scaron;il. Proste tak to je.<\/li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p class=\"has-cyan-bluish-gray-background-color has-background has-medium-font-size\"><strong>Vymyslen&eacute; probl&eacute;my <\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\n<p>Vymyslen&eacute; probl&eacute;my, ned&aacute; sa poveda&#357;, &#382;e vyslovene neu&#382;ito&#269;n&eacute; (napr. meditova&#357; o tom ako o k&oacute;ane v zene, pri dokazovan&iacute; ad absurdum, pri odkr&yacute;van&iacute; sofistick&yacute;ch tvrden&iacute; a argument&aacute;ci&iacute;, pri cibren&iacute; a tr&eacute;novan&iacute; myslenia, &hellip;), ale v realite zbyto&#269;n&eacute;, smie&scaron;ne, zahmlievaj&uacute;ce a odv&aacute;dzaj&uacute;ce od podstaty veci. Filozofovanie pre filozofovanie. Ned&aacute; sa na tom postavi&#357; dom.<\/p>\n\n\n\n<ol><li>Zajac nikdy nedobehne \/ nepredbehne korytna&#269;ku<\/li><li>Gr&eacute;k kri&#269;&iacute; z lode: &bdquo;V&scaron;etci Gr&eacute;ci s&uacute; klam&aacute;ri&ldquo; &ndash; hyperbola vyd&aacute;van&aacute; za fakt, vo&#318;n&eacute; vyjadrovanie, neber to doslovne<\/li><li>M&ocirc;&#382;e Boh stvori&#357; kame&#328;, ktor&yacute; neudvihne?<\/li><li>Mozog v n&aacute;dobe (skepticizmus)<\/li><li>Argument&aacute;cia za pomoci filozofick&yacute;ch argumentov &ndash; Filozofick&aacute; gymnastika, 25 kr&aacute;tkych my&scaron;lienkov&yacute;ch dobrodru&#382;stiev, Stephen Law, Je mo&#382;n&eacute; cestova&#357; v &#269;ase?, str. 52 &ndash; 65 -, pre&#269;o nie je mo&#382;n&eacute; cestovanie v &#269;ase (mysl&iacute;m, &#382;e cestovanie v &#269;ase nie je mo&#382;n&eacute;, ale argument&aacute;cia m&aacute; vych&aacute;dza&#357; z fyziky a logickej podstaty Sveta \/ &#268;asopriestoru a vec&iacute;, nie z filozofie, filozofickej logiky a &bdquo;filozofovania&ldquo; &mdash;&ndash; napr&iacute;klad argument&aacute;cia, &#382;e spisovate&#318; cestuje v &#269;ase a prinesie si knihu, ktor&uacute; m&aacute; nap&iacute;sa&#357; &ndash; ale v &#269;ase, ke&#271; s vyd&aacute;va do bud&uacute;cnosti e&scaron;te kniha nie je skuto&#269;n&aacute; a tak <strong>z jeho miesta a z jeho poh&#318;adu<\/strong> e&scaron;te bud&uacute;cnos&#357;, v ktorej je u&#382; kniha nap&iacute;san&aacute;, nie je skuto&#269;n&aacute; a v&ocirc;bec nie je mo&#382;n&eacute; poveda&#357;, &#382;e ju nap&iacute;&scaron;e &mdash;&ndash; rovnako argument, &#382;e ke&#271; cestujeme ve&#318;mi r&yacute;chlo a vr&aacute;time sa, v podstate cestujeme do bud&uacute;cnosti, ale v tej bud&uacute;cnosti sme tak&yacute;m ist&yacute;m &#269;lovekom, ktor&yacute; nasleduje v[o svojom] &#269;ase hne&#271; po pr&iacute;tomnosti [ktor&aacute; je minulos&#357;ou bud&uacute;cnosti] a hne&#271; po objaven&iacute; sa v bud&uacute;cnosti a ten &#269;lovek v bud&uacute;cnosti [ako in&aacute;, &#271;al&scaron;ia, samostatn&aacute; jednotka] sa nenach&aacute;dza, proste v&#382;dy existuje len ten jeden &#269;lovek, ktor&yacute; ne&#382;ije z pr&iacute;tomnosti do bud&uacute;cnosti (nep&iacute;&scaron;e knihu), ale cestuje v &#269;ase &mdash;&ndash; podobne ak by niekto cestoval do minulosti, stal by sa t&yacute;m ist&yacute;m &#269;lovekom ako bol v tej minulosti, teda stal by sa sebou ako bol v tom &#269;ase a o svojej bud&uacute;cnosti by maxim&aacute;lne mal nejak&eacute; dejav&uacute; [nemysl&iacute;m si dokonca, &#382;e by vedel o sebe ako je vo svojej pr&iacute;tomnosti predt&yacute;m ako cestoval v &#269;ase a cestovan&iacute;m do minulosti by vytvoril nekone&#269;n&uacute; slu&#269;ku a bud&uacute;cnos&#357; &ndash; to &#269;o nastane po pr&iacute;tomnosti &ndash; by pre neho neexistovala, &#269;o by zrejme nechcel, pokia&#318; by nemal super &#382;ivot, ktor&yacute; by mal v bud&uacute;cnosti skon&#269;i&#357;, napr. by bol smrte&#318;ne chor&yacute;] a v podstate by to bolo to &#269;o je teraz, lebo v&scaron;etko je u&#382; dan&eacute; a &#382;ijeme ka&#382;d&uacute; chv&iacute;&#318;u svojho &#382;ivota v svojej minulosti, pr&iacute;tomnosti a bud&uacute;cnosti][rovnako je ot&aacute;zkou, &#382;e keby cestoval alebo chcel cestova&#357; do minulosti, ke&#271; sa e&scaron;te nenarodil, &#269;o by sa stalo, mysl&iacute;m, &#382;e by to proste nebolo mo&#382;n&eacute;] &mdash; v&scaron;etko je u&#382; dan&eacute;, teda je dan&eacute; aj to, &#382;e cestujeme v &#269;ase, &#269;i u&#382; do minulosti alebo bud&uacute;cnosti &ndash; <a rel=\"noreferrer noopener\" href=\"https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=siX1pLhRXuM\" target=\"_blank\">https:\/\/www.youtube.com\/watch?v=siX1pLhRXuM<\/a>)<\/li><li><\/ol>\n\n\n\n<p><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Za\u010dni TU &#8211; https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/wp-admin\/post.php?post=911&amp;action=edit To \u010do &#8222;NIE-existuje&#8220; si nevieme predstavi\u0165 ani pomenova\u0165. U\u017e slovo &#8222;neexistencia&#8220; a ich pou\u017e\u00edvanie v absol\u00fatnom zmysle ako NIE-existencia s\u00fa chybn\u00e9 (m\u00f4\u017ee\u0161 poveda\u0165 ni\u010d v tomto priestore alebo neexistuje d\u00f4vod na nie\u010do, ale nie absol\u00fatnu &#8222;NIE-existenciu&#8220; . S\u00fa nevyhnutnou vedomou chybou v logickom myslen\u00ed, preto\u017ee \u010do m\u00e1 meno, existuje. \u010co chce\u0161 ..<\/p>\n<div class=\"clear-fix\"><\/div>\n<p><a href=\"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/?p=234\" title=\"read more...\">Read more<\/a><\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"open","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_monsterinsights_skip_tracking":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_active":false,"_monsterinsights_sitenote_note":"","_monsterinsights_sitenote_category":0},"categories":[64],"tags":[131,80,130,129],"jetpack_featured_media_url":"","_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234"}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=234"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":8591,"href":"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/234\/revisions\/8591"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=234"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=234"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.mylion.sk\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=234"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}